Resources

California has some of the most plaintiff-friendly personal injury laws in the United States, giving accident victims strong legal protections and the right to pursue full compensation. This statute-by-statute guide explains every major California personal injury law you need to know — from negligence and comparative fault to statutes of limitations and damage caps. Understanding these laws is the first step toward protecting your rights after an accident. Contact Sky Law Group at (844) 475-9529 for a free consultation with an experienced Orange County personal injury attorney.

Foundational Negligence Law: Civil Code Section 1714

California Civil Code Section 1714(a) is the bedrock of personal injury law in the state. It provides: “Everyone is responsible, not only for the result of his or her willful acts, but also for an injury occasioned to another by his or her want of ordinary care or skill in the management of his or her property or person.” This statute establishes the fundamental principle that if someone’s carelessness causes you harm, they are legally responsible for your damages.

Section 1714 creates a general duty of care that applies to virtually all human activity. Courts have interpreted this broadly — it covers drivers on the road, property owners maintaining their premises, professionals providing services, manufacturers producing products, and anyone else whose lack of reasonable care causes injury to another person. Exceptions to this general duty of care are narrowly construed and must be justified by clear policy reasons.

Comparative Negligence: Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975)

California follows a pure comparative negligence system, established by the California Supreme Court in Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 804. Under this system, an injured person can recover damages even if they were partially at fault for the accident. The recovery is simply reduced by the plaintiff’s percentage of fault.

For example, if a jury finds that you were 25% at fault for a car accident and the other driver was 75% at fault, and your total damages are $200,000, you would recover $150,000 (75% of $200,000). California’s pure comparative negligence system is more favorable to plaintiffs than the “modified” systems used in many other states, which bar recovery entirely if the plaintiff’s fault exceeds 50% or 51%.

Insurance companies aggressively use comparative negligence to reduce settlements. They may argue you were speeding, distracted, failed to wear a seatbelt, or otherwise contributed to the accident. An experienced attorney can counter these arguments with evidence showing the defendant bore primary responsibility.

Statute of Limitations: CCP Section 335.1

California Code of Civil Procedure Section 335.1 establishes a two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims. This means you must file a lawsuit within two years of the date of injury, or you permanently lose your right to sue. This deadline applies to all personal injury claims including car accidents, slip and falls, dog bites, medical malpractice, and product liability.

Important Exceptions to the Two-Year Rule

Discovery Rule (CCP Section 340.5): When an injury is not immediately apparent, the statute of limitations begins running from the date the plaintiff discovered (or reasonably should have discovered) the injury and its negligent cause. This is most commonly applied in medical malpractice and toxic exposure cases.

Government Claims (Government Code Section 911.2): Claims against California state or local government entities must be filed within six months of the date of injury. This applies to accidents caused by dangerous road conditions, defective traffic signals, negligent government employees, or any other government-related negligence. The claim must be filed with the specific government entity before a lawsuit can be brought. Missing this six-month deadline is one of the most common and devastating mistakes in personal injury law.

Minors (CCP Section 352): The statute of limitations is tolled (paused) for minors. A person injured before age 18 generally has until their 20th birthday to file a personal injury lawsuit.

Mental Incapacity (CCP Section 352): If the injured person lacks the mental capacity to manage their affairs at the time of injury, the statute of limitations is tolled until capacity is restored.

Defendant Leaves the State (CCP Section 351): If the defendant is absent from California after the cause of action accrues, the time of absence is not counted toward the statute of limitations.

Dog Bite Strict Liability: Civil Code Section 3342

California Civil Code Section 3342 imposes strict liability on dog owners for bite injuries. The statute provides that the owner of a dog is liable for damages suffered by any person who is bitten by the dog while in a public place or lawfully in a private place, regardless of the former viciousness of the dog or the owner’s knowledge of such viciousness. This means you do not need to prove the dog owner was negligent — only that their dog bit you and you were lawfully present where the bite occurred.

Section 3342 applies only to bites, not other dog-related injuries (such as being knocked down by a jumping dog). However, non-bite injuries may be pursued under general negligence principles (Civil Code Section 1714).

Premises Liability: Civil Code Section 1714 and Rowland Factors

California premises liability law holds property owners and occupiers responsible for maintaining reasonably safe conditions. Unlike some states that classify visitors into rigid categories (invitee, licensee, trespasser), California applies a general standard of reasonable care under Section 1714, as interpreted by the California Supreme Court in Rowland v. Christian (1968) 69 Cal.2d 108.

The Rowland factors consider: the foreseeability of harm, the degree of certainty that the plaintiff suffered injury, the closeness of the connection between the defendant’s conduct and the injury, the moral blame attached to the defendant’s conduct, the policy of preventing future harm, the extent of the burden to the defendant, the consequences to the community, and the availability of insurance. Slip and fall cases are the most common premises liability claims in Orange County.

Vehicle Code Provisions for Traffic Accidents

Vehicle Code Section 21658.1: Lane Splitting

California is the only state that explicitly permits motorcycle lane splitting. Vehicle Code Section 21658.1 authorizes the California Highway Patrol to develop guidelines for safe lane splitting. This law affects liability determinations in motorcycle accident cases — a motorcyclist who was lane-splitting at the time of a collision may or may not be found partially at fault depending on whether their lane-splitting was conducted safely.

Vehicle Code Section 21950: Pedestrian Right-of-Way

Section 21950 requires drivers to yield the right-of-way to pedestrians crossing within marked or unmarked crosswalks. Drivers must exercise due care for the safety of any pedestrian on a roadway. This statute creates strong legal protection for pedestrian accident victims, as drivers are held to a heightened standard of care around pedestrians.

Vehicle Code Section 23152/23153: DUI

Sections 23152 (misdemeanor DUI) and 23153 (felony DUI causing injury) are relevant to personal injury claims because a DUI conviction or BAC evidence can establish negligence per se — meaning the violation of the DUI statute is automatic evidence of negligence. DUI-related personal injury cases often support claims for punitive damages in addition to compensatory damages.

Wrongful Death: CCP Section 377.60

California Code of Civil Procedure Section 377.60 establishes who may bring a wrongful death action. Eligible plaintiffs include the decedent’s surviving spouse or domestic partner, the decedent’s children, and if neither exists, anyone who would be entitled to the property of the decedent by intestate succession. Section 377.61 provides that damages in a wrongful death action may include the pecuniary loss suffered by the heirs, including loss of financial support, loss of love, companionship, comfort, care, and moral support, and funeral and burial expenses.

Rideshare Liability: AB 2293

Assembly Bill 2293 (codified in Insurance Code Sections 11580.24-11580.26) established insurance requirements for transportation network companies (TNCs) like Uber and Lyft. The law requires $1 million in commercial liability coverage when a driver is actively transporting passengers or en route to pick up a passenger. When the app is on but no ride has been accepted, minimum coverage of $50,000 per person and $100,000 per accident for bodily injury applies.

Proposition 51: Several Liability for Non-Economic Damages

Civil Code Section 1431.2, enacted by Proposition 51 in 1986, limits each defendant’s liability for non-economic damages (pain and suffering, emotional distress) to their proportionate share of fault. However, each defendant remains jointly and severally liable for all economic damages (medical bills, lost wages). This distinction matters in multi-defendant cases — if one defendant is insolvent or uninsured, the remaining defendants can be held responsible for the full amount of economic damages but only their proportionate share of non-economic damages.

MICRA: Medical Malpractice Damage Caps

The Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA), as amended by Assembly Bill 35 (effective January 1, 2023), caps non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases. For cases not involving wrongful death, the cap began at $350,000 in 2023 and increases by $40,000 annually until reaching $750,000 in 2033. For wrongful death cases, the cap started at $500,000 and increases by $50,000 annually until reaching $1 million in 2033. These caps apply only to medical malpractice claims — other personal injury claims have no caps on non-economic damages in California.

Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist Law

California Insurance Code Section 11580.2 requires insurance companies to offer uninsured motorist (UM) and underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage to all policyholders. Insurers must provide UM/UIM coverage unless the policyholder explicitly rejects it in writing. UM coverage protects you if you are hit by a driver who has no insurance. UIM coverage applies when the at-fault driver’s insurance is insufficient to cover your damages.

Evidence Preservation: Spoliation of Evidence

California courts take evidence preservation seriously. Under the doctrine of spoliation of evidence, a party who intentionally destroys or fails to preserve relevant evidence may face adverse inference instructions, monetary sanctions, or even terminating sanctions. In personal injury cases, this is particularly relevant to trucking companies that may be required to preserve electronic logging device data, dashcam footage, and maintenance records.

Contact Sky Law Group

Understanding California personal injury law is essential to protecting your rights after an accident. If you have been injured in Orange County, the experienced attorneys at Sky Law Group can evaluate your case, explain which laws apply to your situation, and fight for the maximum compensation you deserve. Call (844) 475-9529 for a free, no-obligation consultation. We work on a contingency fee basis — you pay nothing unless we win. Se habla español.