Resources

California At-Fault Accidents Explained: Who Pays, How Fault Is Determined, and How Comparative Negligence Works Short answer: California is a pure comparative negligence state. That means after an accident, each driver’s percentage of fault is calculated, and each party pays damages proportional to their share of fault — even a driver who was 99% at fault can recover 1% of their damages from the other party. Insurance companies use these percentages to allocate claim payouts, and juries assign them when cases go to trial. If you were injured in a California accident where fault is disputed, the single most important thing you can do is not accept the insurance adjuster’s initial fault determination. Those determinations are deliberately slanted against claimants. Call Sky Law Group at (844) 475-9529 — Hablamos Español. California’s Pure Comparative Negligence Rule — The Math Under Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal.3d 804 (1975), California replaced the old “contributory negligence” rule (where any fault barred recovery) with pure comparative negligence. The rule is codified in California Civil Jury Instructions CACI 405 and applied as follows: Both parties recover something. Cyclist is 51% at fault, Driver is 49% at fault. Even over 50% fault, cyclist still recovers 49% of damages. California does NOT have a 50% bar rule like other states. This differs from modified comparative negligence states (like Georgia, Texas, and Florida) where plaintiffs over 50% at fault recover nothing. California’s rule is more favorable to injured parties. How Fault Is Determined — The Four Primary […]